Further
enhancements to this investigation are envisioned. Had we had more time, we
would have done more repeats of the tests mentioned above to confirm if there
was indeed a trend, or lack thereof. We would also have sonicated the bacteria
samples for a longer period of time, to increase the validity of the trend
observed.
First, the
frequency of ultrasound applied to the bacteria to strengthen the effectiveness
of the antibiotic can be extended to a larger testing range. The frequency of
the ultrasound may not have been high enough to cause a noticeable difference in
the growth or inhibition of E. coli.
Another promising
field of continuation research is to test the application of ultrasound on the
effectiveness of different kinds of antibiotics. The mechanisms of different
antibiotics involved in permeating the cell membranes vary from each other, and
therefore the enhancement of sonication will differ depending on the kinds of
antibiotics being used.
This investigation can also be enhanced
by varying the power of ultrasound applied. Previous research has shown that
other than passive
diffusion, the ultrasound
energy may also serve to be an active energy source, to exert a force on the
antibiotic molecules and push them through pores on the cell membrane. Therefore
an ultrasound with a greater power will result in better permeation of
antibiotics, for there is more ultrasound energy provided.
A permeability test of biological
membrane should be done to confirm that the ultrasound did in fact enhance the
permeation of antibiotics into the cell, preferably to chart the permeability of
molecules and the size of the corresponding molecules.
